Design Rate Limiter
System Design Challenge
Design Rate Limiter
What is Rate Limiter?
A Rate Limiter is a system that controls the rate of requests to prevent abuse and ensure fair resource usage. It's similar to systems used by API gateways, CDNs, or cloud services. The service provides request throttling, abuse prevention, and resource protection.
High-performance request throttling with distributed coordination is what makes systems like Rate Limiter unique. By understanding Rate Limiter, you can tackle interview questions for similar throttling systems, since the core design challenges—algorithm selection, distributed coordination, performance optimization, and accuracy—remain the same.
Functional Requirements
Core (Interview Focussed)
- Request Throttling: Limit requests per user, IP, or API key.
- Multiple Algorithms: Support different rate limiting algorithms.
- Distributed Coordination: Coordinate rate limits across multiple servers.
- Real-time Monitoring: Monitor rate limit usage and violations.
Out of Scope
- User authentication and authorization
- Rate limit configuration management
- Historical analytics and reporting
- Rate limit notifications
- Mobile app specific features
Non-Functional Requirements
Core (Interview Focussed)
- High performance: Sub-millisecond response time for rate limit checks.
- High availability: 99.9% uptime for rate limiting services.
- Scalability: Handle millions of requests per second.
- Accuracy: Ensure accurate rate limit enforcement.
Out of Scope
- Data retention policies
- Compliance and privacy regulations
💡 Interview Tip: Focus on high performance, high availability, and scalability. Interviewers care most about algorithm selection, distributed coordination, and performance optimization.
Core Entities
Entity | Key Attributes | Notes |
---|---|---|
RateLimit | limit_id, user_id, limit_type, limit_value, window_size | Indexed by user_id for fast lookups |
Request | request_id, user_id, timestamp, endpoint, ip_address | Track request history |
Violation | violation_id, user_id, timestamp, limit_type, count | Track rate limit violations |
Usage | usage_id, user_id, window_start, request_count | Track usage within time windows |
💡 Interview Tip: Focus on RateLimit, Request, and Usage as they drive rate limiting, request tracking, and usage monitoring.
Core APIs
Rate Limiting
POST /rate-limit/check { user_id, endpoint, limit_type }
– Check if request is allowedGET /rate-limit/status { user_id, limit_type }
– Get current usage statusPOST /rate-limit/reset { user_id, limit_type }
– Reset rate limit counter
Configuration
POST /rate-limit/config { user_id, limit_type, limit_value, window_size }
– Set rate limitGET /rate-limit/config { user_id, limit_type }
– Get rate limit configurationDELETE /rate-limit/config { user_id, limit_type }
– Remove rate limit
Monitoring
GET /rate-limit/usage { user_id, time_range }
– Get usage statisticsGET /rate-limit/violations { user_id, time_range }
– Get violation historyGET /rate-limit/health
– Get system health status
High-Level Design
System Architecture Diagram
Key Components
- Rate Limiter Service: Handle rate limit checks and enforcement
- Algorithm Engine: Implement different rate limiting algorithms
- Distributed Coordinator: Coordinate rate limits across servers
- Usage Tracker: Track and store usage data
- Configuration Manager: Manage rate limit configurations
- Database: Persistent storage for configurations and usage data
Mapping Core Functional Requirements to Components
Functional Requirement | Responsible Components | Key Considerations |
---|---|---|
Request Throttling | Rate Limiter Service, Algorithm Engine | Low latency, accurate enforcement |
Multiple Algorithms | Algorithm Engine | Algorithm selection, performance optimization |
Distributed Coordination | Distributed Coordinator | Consistency, synchronization |
Real-time Monitoring | Usage Tracker, Database | Real-time updates, data aggregation |
Detailed Design
Rate Limiter Service
Purpose: Handle rate limit checks and enforce limits on incoming requests.
Key Design Decisions:
- Algorithm Selection: Choose appropriate algorithm based on use case
- Caching: Cache rate limit data for performance
- Async Processing: Process rate limit checks asynchronously
- Error Handling: Handle rate limit check failures gracefully
Algorithm: Rate limit check
1. Receive rate limit check request
2. Extract user_id and limit_type
3. Get rate limit configuration
4. Apply rate limiting algorithm:
- Token Bucket: Check available tokens
- Sliding Window: Check requests in time window
- Fixed Window: Check requests in current window
5. If limit not exceeded:
- Allow request
- Update usage counter
- Return success
6. If limit exceeded:
- Reject request
- Log violation
- Return rate limit exceeded
Algorithm Engine
Purpose: Implement different rate limiting algorithms.
Key Design Decisions:
- Token Bucket: Allow burst traffic with token-based limiting
- Sliding Window: Provide smooth rate limiting with sliding time windows
- Fixed Window: Simple rate limiting with fixed time windows
- Algorithm Switching: Switch algorithms based on requirements
Algorithm: Token Bucket implementation
1. Initialize bucket with token capacity
2. For each request:
- Check if tokens are available
- If tokens available:
- Consume one token
- Allow request
- If no tokens:
- Reject request
3. Refill tokens at regular intervals
4. Handle burst traffic with token accumulation
Algorithm: Sliding Window implementation
1. Maintain sliding window of requests
2. For each request:
- Add request to current window
- Remove expired requests from window
- Count requests in window
- If count <= limit:
- Allow request
- If count > limit:
- Reject request
3. Use efficient data structures for window management
Distributed Coordinator
Purpose: Coordinate rate limits across multiple servers.
Key Design Decisions:
- Consistent Hashing: Distribute rate limit data across servers
- Data Replication: Replicate rate limit data for availability
- Conflict Resolution: Handle conflicts in distributed rate limiting
- Synchronization: Synchronize rate limit state across servers
Algorithm: Distributed rate limiting
1. Hash user_id to determine server
2. Check rate limit on assigned server
3. If server unavailable:
- Use fallback server
- Apply rate limit with reduced accuracy
4. Synchronize rate limit state:
- Broadcast updates to other servers
- Handle network partitions
5. Maintain eventual consistency
Database Design
Rate Limits Table
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
limit_id | VARCHAR(36) | Primary key |
user_id | VARCHAR(36) | User identifier |
limit_type | VARCHAR(50) | Type of rate limit |
limit_value | INT | Limit value |
window_size | INT | Time window in seconds |
created_at | TIMESTAMP | Creation timestamp |
Indexes:
idx_user_limit_type
on (user_id, limit_type) - User rate limitsidx_limit_type
on (limit_type) - Rate limit type queries
Usage Table
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
usage_id | VARCHAR(36) | Primary key |
user_id | VARCHAR(36) | User identifier |
limit_type | VARCHAR(50) | Rate limit type |
window_start | TIMESTAMP | Window start time |
request_count | INT | Request count in window |
Indexes:
idx_user_window
on (user_id, window_start) - User usage historyidx_window_start
on (window_start) - Time-based cleanup
Violations Table
Field | Type | Description |
---|---|---|
violation_id | VARCHAR(36) | Primary key |
user_id | VARCHAR(36) | User identifier |
limit_type | VARCHAR(50) | Violated limit type |
timestamp | TIMESTAMP | Violation timestamp |
request_count | INT | Request count at violation |
Indexes:
idx_user_timestamp
on (user_id, timestamp) - User violationsidx_timestamp
on (timestamp) - Time-based queries
Scalability Considerations
Horizontal Scaling
- Rate Limiter Service: Scale horizontally with load balancers
- Algorithm Engine: Use consistent hashing for data distribution
- Distributed Coordinator: Scale coordination with distributed systems
- Database: Shard usage data by user_id
Caching Strategy
- Redis: Cache rate limit data and usage counters
- Application Cache: Cache frequently accessed configurations
- Database Cache: Cache rate limit configurations
Performance Optimization
- Connection Pooling: Efficient database connections
- Batch Processing: Batch usage updates for efficiency
- Async Processing: Non-blocking rate limit checks
- Resource Monitoring: Monitor CPU, memory, and network usage
Monitoring and Observability
Key Metrics
- Check Latency: Average rate limit check time
- Throughput: Rate limit checks per second
- Violation Rate: Percentage of requests that exceed limits
- System Health: CPU, memory, and disk usage
Alerting
- High Latency: Alert when check time exceeds threshold
- High Violation Rate: Alert when violation rate increases
- System Errors: Alert on rate limit check failures
- Resource Exhaustion: Alert on high resource usage
Trade-offs and Considerations
Consistency vs. Availability
- Choice: Eventual consistency for distributed rate limiting
- Reasoning: Rate limiting can tolerate slight delays for better availability
Accuracy vs. Performance
- Choice: Use approximation algorithms for better performance
- Reasoning: Balance between rate limit accuracy and response time
Memory vs. Performance
- Choice: Use in-memory caching for better performance
- Reasoning: Balance between memory usage and response time
Common Interview Questions
Q: How would you handle distributed rate limiting?
A: Use consistent hashing, data replication, and eventual consistency to handle distributed rate limiting.
Q: How do you choose the right rate limiting algorithm?
A: Consider use case requirements: Token Bucket for burst traffic, Sliding Window for smooth limiting, Fixed Window for simplicity.
Q: How would you scale this system globally?
A: Deploy regional rate limiter servers, use geo-distributed databases, and implement data replication strategies.
Q: How do you handle rate limit bypassing?
A: Use multiple identification methods, IP-based limiting, and behavioral analysis to prevent bypassing.
Key Takeaways
- Algorithm Selection: Different algorithms provide flexibility for different use cases
- Distributed Coordination: Consistent hashing and data replication enable distributed rate limiting
- Performance Optimization: Caching and async processing are essential for high-performance rate limiting
- Scalability: Horizontal scaling and partitioning are crucial for handling large-scale traffic
- Monitoring: Comprehensive monitoring ensures system reliability and performance